Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Research’ Category

Photo: Caroline Silber for Strategies for Children

Photo: Caroline Silber for Strategies for Children

A while back, I posted a delightful video of a young French girl imaginatively retelling the story of Winnie the Pooh. I asked Betty Bardige, an expert on early language development, to comment, and she remarked that the little girl’s well-developed language skills would make her a popular playmate. New research finds another social-emotional advantage of strong early language skills. Toddlers with better language skills are better able to manage frustration once they are preschool-age.

“Angry outbursts like temper tantrums are common among toddlers, but by the time children enter school, they’re expected to have more self-control,” MedicalXpress reports. “To help them acquire this skill, they’re taught to use language skills like ‘using your words.’ This study sought to determine whether developing language skills relates to developing anger control. Does developing language ability reduce anger between ages 2 and 4?”

To answer this question, researchers followed 120 children, starting at 18 months until they were 4. The children, most of whom were white, were from families whose income was above the poverty level but below middle income. In home visits and in the lab, researchers assessed children’s language skills and their ability to cope with potentially frustrating situations. The study, published in the journal Child Development, provides the first longitudinal evidence linking language skills with a child’s later ability to regulate anger, according to principal investigator Pamela Cole, a research professor of psychology at Pennsylvania State University.

In one situation, researchers asked children to wait eight minutes before opening a gift. During the eight minutes their mothers were busy answering researchers’ questions.

“Children whose language developed more quickly were more likely to calmly seek their mother’s support while waiting when they were 3, which in turn predicted less anger at 4,” MedicalXpress reports. “Children whose language developed more quickly also were better able to occupy themselves when they were 4, which in turn helped them tolerate the wait.”

Concludes Cole: “Better language skills may help children verbalize rather than use emotions to convey needs and use their imaginations to occupy themselves while enduring a frustrating wait.”

Read Full Post »

Photo:Caroline Silber for Strategies for Children

A shorthand saying holds that until third grade children are learning to read, and after third grade they are reading to learn. Research, however, shows that it’s not that simple. Children’s background knowledge – their understanding of how the world works – is the key ingredient of learning to read with comprehension as well as fluency. And building background knowledge begins in early childhood.

This is what Nonie Lesaux, a literacy expert at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, told us in 2010 when we commissioned her to write “Turning the Page: Refocusing Massachusetts for Reading Success.”

And it’s embedded in the Common Core State Standards’ approach to literacy, “in which,” Education Week reports, “fluency and comprehension skills evolve together throughout every grade and subject in a student’s academic life, from the first time a toddler gums a board book to the moment a medical student reads data from a brain scan.” (more…)

Read Full Post »

Photo: Caroline Silber for Strategies for Children

Photo: Caroline Silber for Strategies for Children

Conversation about the benefits of high-quality early education often focuses on long-term benefits such as increased employment and earnings and reduced reliance on public assistance. A recent brief from ReadyNation, a national business partnership for early childhood and economic success, reminds us that many benefits are short-term. (See “Savings Now, Savings Later: Smart Early Childhood Programs Pay Off Right Away and for the Long Term.”)

“We don’t have to wait 10 or 20 years to see strong returns on our investments in young children. Some programs create real savings in a year or less. Early education also improves third-grade scores,” the brief notes. It highlights three areas:

  • “Quality home visiting/parent mentoring programs can reduce costs and improve outcomes now,” through such outcomes as reducing low-birthweight births and reducing child abuse and neglect.
  • “Effective pre-kindergarten programs reduce costly grade retention, special education and other services right away.” A Pennsylvania program, (more…)

Read Full Post »

Photo: Kate Samp for Strategies for Children

As communities in Massachusetts and elsewhere focus on improving third grade reading, the strategy of engaging volunteers to help young readers raises a number of questions. What is the best way to harness the energy of volunteers? Should volunteers work with struggling readers or should they work with other students so teachers can spend extra time with struggling readers? If volunteers work with struggling readers, what kind of training and how much training do they need to have a positive impact on children’s literacy?

A recent study by researchers at Queen’s University Belfast in Northern Ireland explores some of these questions, Early Ed Watch reports. Researchers looked at Time to Read, a program that assigns businesspeople to work with 8- and 9-year-olds who were struggling with reading. The tutors had two hours of training and received additional materials they could incorporate into their work. They were free to use their own materials. Tutors worked with students for two half-hour sessions a week over the school year. Researchers found that Time to Read students had higher scores in phonics, reading aloud and reading fluency than a control group, according to a study in the June 2012 issue of The Journal of Early Childhood Research. However, they read with no more accuracy than children in the control group and exhibited no more comprehension or enjoyment of reading.

“Volunteers with little to no training are unlikely to help a child improve his or her reading comprehension or reading confidence — skills that may be more effectively taught by professional educators,” Early Ed Watch states. “Understanding the limitations of tutoring can help programs focus on better preparing volunteers.”

The findings complement the conclusions of “Turning the Page: Refocusing Massachusetts for Reading Success,” the report that Strategies for Children commissioned in 2010 from Nonie Lesaux, Ph.D., of the Harvard Graduate School of Education.

“Reaching the tipping point for changing behaviors so as to improve children’s reading outcomes requires a deep, sustained investment of time and effort. Yet the dosage levels, intensity and depth of services, matter—such as how much time is spent in the program, how often it happens, or the frequency of contact with participants.” Lesaux writes. “For many language and reading supports, these increments are too small; consider the weekly tutoring session or the periodic parent education night that never gains enough traction to influence behaviors and, in turn, make a difference to reading outcomes.”

Read Full Post »

A recent column by Phil Power, the president of the Center for Michigan, which describes itself as a “centrist think-and-do tank,” has a message that resonates beyond that Midwestern state.

“One of the things that gets people maddest about the way government works is when we know something is true, and the authorities do the opposite, time and time again,” Phil Power writes in the Holland [MI] Sentinel. “It is beyond dispute that children learn the quickest and best from birth to age 5. When do we usually start spending a lot of public money on educating our children? At age 5, when they enter kindergarten.”

Citing research on the long-lasting benefits of Michigan’s Great Start Readiness Program, Power supports efforts to revise Michigan’s School Aid Act include prekindergarten. “Early childhood programs available to all,” he writes, “could be an absolute game-changer for Michigan kids — and for Michigan employers, who are complaining loudly about not being able to find skilled employees.”

Read Full Post »

Photo: Michele McDonald for Strategies for Children

Evidence continues to mount about how much young children learn through play. Now a new report in the journal Science shows that children at play use sophisticated scientific and mathematical principles to explore how the world works.  The report, by psychologist Alison Gopnik of the University of California, Berkeley, reviews more than a decade of research and finds that very young children are natural experimenters. (See also “Studies Shed Light on the Minds of Young Children.”)

“New theoretical ideas and empirical research show that very young children’s learning and thinking are strikingly similar to much learning and thinking in science,” the Science report’s abstract states. ”Preschoolers test hypotheses against data and make causal inferences; they learn from statistics and informal experimentation, and from watching and listening to others. The mathematical framework of probabilistic models and Bayesian inference can describe this learning in precise ways. These discoveries have implications for early childhood education and policy. In particular, they suggest both that early childhood experience is extremely important and that the trend toward more structured and academic early childhood programs is misguided.”

Gopnik’s lab, for instance, (more…)

Read Full Post »

Photo: Alessandra Hartkopf for Strategies for Children

Think Simon Says is a simple children’s game? Think again, suggests a recent item in The New York Times that offers more evidence of the important role of play in developing critical executive function skills in young children.  As I noted in an earlier blog post (With Young Children, Play is the Curriculum), play helps children learn the executive function skills that research finds are important for school success.

“A growing body of research suggests that playing certain kinds of childhood games may be the best way to increase a child’s ability to do well in school,” the Times reports. “Variations on games like Freeze Tag and Simon Says require relatively high levels of executive function, testing a child’s ability to pay attention, remember rules and exhibit self-control — qualities that also predict academic success.”

With Simon Says, for instance. asking children to do the opposite of what Simon says “helps a child develop mental flexibility and self-control,” the Times reports. Researchers at Oregon State University use a game they call Head-to-Toes to assess young children’s development. The game starts with preschoolers copying the teacher’s movement – touching either her head or her toes. Asking children to do the opposite requires more complex cognitive skills, such as attention, focus, memory, self-control and mental flexibility.

Oregon State researchers followed 430 children from preschool to age 25 and found that children’s ability at age 4 to pay attention and finish a task were the greatest predictors of their chances of graduating from college by 25. Another study cited by the Times found that young children who are better at games like Simon Says perform better in reading and math. Still another found that children who began the school year with low levels of self-control improved after playing games like Red Light Green Light, the Times reports.

“Focusing on the how of learning, on executive functions, gives you the skills to learn new information, which is why they tend to be so predictive of long-term success,” Ellen Galinsky, a child-development researcher and author of “Mind in the Making: The Seven Essential Life Skills Every Child Needs,” tells the Times.

 

 

Read Full Post »

A new report  from the Center for the Next Generation and the Center for American Progress — “The Competition that Really Matters: Comparing U.S., Chinese, and Indian Investments in the Next Generation Workforce” – raises provocative questions about the United States’ global competitiveness. And early education is among the issues the report addresses.

“Half of U.S. children get no early childhood education,” the report notes, “and we have no national strategy to increase enrollment.”

In China, 51% of 3- and 4-year-olds have at least a year of publicly funded preschool, up from  9% in 1980. And China has set an ambitious national goal of enrolling 40 million children in preschool by 2020 – or 50% more than are currently enrolled. It also aims to provide 70% of its young children with three years of preschool by 2020, according to the report.

“Total state funding for pre-k programs (in the U.S.) decreased by $60 million in 2011, after decreasing by $30 million the previous year,” the report states. “So just as China is ramping up its investments in early childhood education,… the United States is reducing investment in preschool learning and has set no clear national goals to counter China with a bold plan to increase access and improve quality of early learning in our country.”

To be sure, India and China have large numbers of families living in deep poverty, and there are questions about the quality of programming in both countries. Yet, the report notes, the sheer size of the population in India and China should give U.S. policymakers pause and reinforce the urgency of ensuring that all of our children have the tools they need to participate in an increasingly sophisticated global economy. (more…)

Read Full Post »

The folks at the First Five Years Fund – who brought us the fabulous “Early Learning Matters” video – have another terrific animated video in their toolkit for advocates of high-quality early education. This time it’s “Brain Builders,” narrated by Dr. Jack Shonkoff, director of the Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. In the more recent video, Shonkoff uses layman’s terms to explain the complex neurological and molecular interaction between children’s early experiences and the developing architecture of their young brains.

“The healthy development of young children in the early years of life literally does provide a foundation for just about all of the challenging social problems that our society and other societies face,” Shonkoff says. “What we’re learning through exciting developments in neuroscience and molecular biology is how much early experience from birth – in fact, even before birth – how much this experience literally gets into our bodies and shapes our learning capacities and behaviors and physical and mental health. The brain is basically built from the bottom up. First, the brain builds basic circuits and more complex circuits are built on top of those basic circuits as we develop more complex skills. Biologically the brain is prepared to be shaped by experience. It is expecting the experiences that a young child has to literally influence the formation of its circuitry.”

Read Full Post »

Photo: Michele McDonald for Strategies for Children

The annual report on the cost of child care is out, and once again Massachusetts has the highest average annual costs in the nation for both 4-year-olds and infants in full-time, center-based care. The commonwealth is also among the most expensive states for family child care, ranking fourth most expensive for infants behind New York, Connecticut and Rhode Island and second behind New York for 4-year-olds.

Fees in 2011 for a 4-year-old in Massachusetts average $11,669 a year in a center-based program and $9,496 with a family child care provider, according to “Parents and the High Cost of Child Care: 2012 Report” – by Child Care Aware of America (formerly NACCRRA, the National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies). Fees for a Bay State infant average $14,980 in a center and $9,346 in family child care.

Although costs are down slightly from 2010, when center-based care averaged $16,500 for an infant and $12,200 for a 4-year-old, the report still counts Massachusetts among the 10 least affordable states for center-based care. The report calculates affordability by analyzing the cost of child care as a percentage of each state’s median income for two-parent families.

The relatively high cost of living and relatively high licensing standards in Massachusetts combine to make child care here particularly expensive. In Massachusetts and across the country, much of the cost of early education and care is borne by high fees for parents and low wages for early educators.

The annual cost for center-based child care exceeds a year’s in-state tuition and fees at a four-year public college in 35 states and the District of Columbia, (more…)

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,434 other followers

%d bloggers like this: