Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘K-12’ Category

Photo: Kate Samp for Strategies for Children

The journal Future of Children, a collaboration of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and the Brookings Institution,  has published an issue – Literacy Challenges for the Twenty-First Century – that’s chock full of thought-provoking articles.  An accompanying policy brief examines the relationship between standards and literacy development. (I’ll write later about some of the individual articles in the journal.)

Massachusetts is among the 45 states that have adopted the Common Core State Standards, which the authors of the policy brief strongly support. “Standards are an important part – but only one part – of solving the literacy problem,” they write. “Even the best possible standards cannot raise student literacy unless they are part of a larger strategy. Excellent standards are a first step.”

The policy brief is written by Ron Haskins, co-director of the Center on Children and Families at the Brookings Institution; Richard Murnane, a professor at the Harvard Graduate School of Education; Isabel Sawhill, co-director of the Center on Children and Families; and Catherine Snow, a professor at the Harvard Graduate School of Education.

The authors enumerate key elements of a successful strategy to boost children’s literacy. Improving the quality teaching, they write, is “the single most important element in any strategy aiming to boost student literacy and close the literacy gap.”  They suggest redirecting federal funds to create “a competitive grant program that encourages school systems to design and implement programs to improve teaching and learning in high-poverty schools.” They also call for:

  • Adoption by states of assessments now being designed to accompany the Common Core.
  • A common system for reporting results that will provide schools, parents and communities with detailed knowledge about how their students are performing relative to the Common Core and to other communities.
  • A better curriculum that is aligned with the Common Core.

“The more demanding Common Core standards in literacy, based on reading comprehension, conceptual knowledge, and vocabulary as well as accurate and fluent reading, combined with accurate assessments of these skills will reveal how far disadvantaged children lag behind on these more advanced literacy skills,” the authors write. “Rather than wait for the expanded literacy gap to be revealed, U.S. policymakers and educators should begin now to shrink the gap.”

Read Full Post »

The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education released results of the 2012 MCAS (Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System) test today. Here is the news release about the third grade reading results that Strategies for Children sent to media outlets:

September 17, 2012 – In Massachusetts, 39% of third graders are not proficient readers, according to MCAS results released today. Performance in reading on the third grade MCAS has remained stagnant since 2001, when 38% of third graders scored below proficient in reading.  Among children from low-income families, 60%lag in reading.

See charts: Trends in Third Grade Reading, by Income and Third Grade Reading 2012 MCAS.

Reading is the foundation of success in both the classroom and the workplace. Research finds that third grade reading is a critical educational benchmark that strongly predicts children’s future performance in school and beyond. In July, the Legislature passed An Act Relative to Third Grade Reading Proficiency with overwhelming bipartisan support. Today, the bill was enacted by the House and Senate and is currently before Governor Patrick. The bill, which was introduced by Senator Katherine Clark (D-Melrose) and Representative Marty Walz (D-Boston), would establish an Early Literacy Expert Panel to advise state agencies on research-based strategies to improve the language and literacy development of children from birth to age 9.

Amy O’Leary, director of Early Education for All, a campaign of Strategies for Children, issued the following statement:

“We should all be alarmed that 39% of third graders are not proficient readers and that Massachusetts has made virtually no progress in third grade reading over the past decade. We should all be concerned about the wide and persistent achievement gap. We know what to do to improve children’s literacy. We must act now on this knowledge. (more…)

Read Full Post »

Photo: Kate Samp for Strategies for Children

The federal National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) has launched a longitudinal study of the kindergarten class of 2010-11 that will run through their expected completion of fifth grade in 2016. The first report is a profile of the nation’s 3.5 million first-time kindergartners, drawn from the study’s nationally representative sample of 18,200 children enrolled in 970 schools.

The recently released profile of kindergartners includes both demographic and educational information.

First the demographics:

  • One-quarter of first-time kindergartners live in households with incomes below federal poverty levels.
  • Three-quarters (76%) live in two-parent households.
  • Almost two-fifths (38%) have parents who have earned a bachelor’s degree or higher.
  • A small majority (53%) are white, 24% are Hispanic, 13% are black, 4% are Asian and 4% are two or more races.

The new study from NCES, which is part of the U.S. Department of Education, is the third in a series of longitudinal studies of young children.

In the recently released profile of kindergartners, NCES also assessed children’s early reading and math skills (more…)

Read Full Post »

Photo: Alessandra Hartkopf for Strategies for Children

There’s yet more evidence of the long-term benefits of high-quality early education, this time from Michigan’s Great Start Readiness Program, a state-funded pre-kindergarten program for children at risk of school failure founded in 1985 as a limited pilot. It now serves about 30,000 children.

Researchers from the HighScope Educational Research Foundation have been following 338 children who attended Great Start (GSRP) in 1995-6 and a control group of 258 children from similar demographic backgrounds. The children have now graduated from high school, thus yielding valuable longitudinal data, which HighScope recently presented to Michigan’s board of education.

The findings include:

  • Kindergarten teachers consistently rated GSRP graduates as more advanced in imagination and creativity, demonstrating initiative, retaining learning, completing assignments and as having good attendance.
  • Second grade teachers rated GSRP graduates higher on being ready to learn, able to retain learning, maintaining good attendance and having an interest in school.
  • A higher percentage of 4th grade GSRP graduates passed the MEAP [Michigan Educational Assessment Program] compared to non-GSRP students.
  • Significantly fewer GSRP participants were retained in grade than non-GSRP students between 2nd and 12th grades (36.5% versus 49.2% in 12th grade).
  • Significantly fewer GSRP children of color were retained for two or more grades than their non-GSRP counterparts by the 12th grade (14.3% versus 28.1% in 12th grade).
  • More GSRP students graduated on time from high school than non-GSRP participants (58.3% versus 43.0%).
  • More GSRP children of color graduated on time from high school than non-GSRP participants (59.7% vs. 36.5%).

Researchers also estimated that 43.5% of Great Start’s cost was recouped through savings from the reduction in grade retention.

“This simple calculation does not quantify additional savings from reducing school failure and delayed high school graduation, as well as their lifetime effects on earnings and employment and crime reduction,” the report states. “This return could be increased by better targeting of children and better funding per child leading to higher-quality programming.”

Read Full Post »

The children at the Roger Clap Innovation School, an elementary school in Boston’s Dorchester neighborhood, earned quite an end-of-the-year treat. Their principal, Justin Vernon, dressed up as Lady Gaga and milked a cow named Moxie.

What did the children do to earn such august entertainment? They read a lot of books. Vernon had promised them that if they read 10,000 books by the end of the school term, he would dress up as Lady Gaga. They read 13,000 books, and Vernon was true to his word, The Boston Globe reports. He donned a blond wig, black dress and tiara.

“’I can’t tell you how proud of you I am,’ Vernon, dressed as the pop star, told students. ‘And I think I make for a pretty good Lady Gaga,’” the Globe reports.

“Amid the squeals of classmates, fifth-grader Margaret Gould said: ‘We were very excited to see our principal dress up, and we’re really impressed that he did it.’”

The Roger Clap is Boston’s first innovation school. After being threatened with closure in 2010, it reopened as an innovation school in September. The school has about 150 students in pre-kindergarten through fifth grade, according to its website. That comes to an average of about 87 books per student.

Joseph Shea, Boston’s academic superintendent for elementary schools, witnessed the festivities at Roger Clap. “This is absolutely fantastic,” Shea told the Globe. “In my 40-plus years, I’ve never seen anything like it.”

Read Full Post »

“At least some of the answers to turning around our nation’s struggling K-12 public schools can be found at the nearest preschool….  At a time of considerable urgency and demand for improvements in our nation’s schools, particularly when it comes to evaluating the effectiveness of teachers, there is no need to reinvent the wheel. Instead of looking to the development and implementation of new educational models and methodologies, K-12 educators would do well to learn from the lessons and experience accrued by their counterparts in the early childhood sector, specifically when it comes to teacher performance evaluation.”

Robert Pianta, Curry School of Education, University of Virginia, Implementing Observation Protocols: Lessons for K-12 Education from the Field of Early Childhood,May 2012

Read Full Post »

Photo: Kate Samp for Strategies for Children

“At least some of the answers to turning around our nation’s struggling K-12 public schools can be found at the nearest preschool.”

With this admittedly “counterintuitive” statement, Robert Pianta, dean of the Curry School of Education at the University of Virginia, begins his recent report on teacher observation, published by the Center for American Progress. Citing “decades of experience using observation in early childhood education,” Pianta contends that two major observation systems contain important lessons for efforts to reform teacher evaluations used in K-12 settings.

“At a time of considerable urgency and demand for improvements in our nation’s schools, particularly when it comes to evaluating the effectiveness of teachers, there is no need to reinvent the wheel. Instead of looking to the development and implementation of new educational models and methodologies, K-12 educators would do well to learn from the lessons and experience accrued by their counterparts in the early childhood sector, specifically when it comes to teacher performance evaluation,” Pianta writes in Implementing Observation Protocols: Lessons for K-12 Education from the Field of Early Childhood.” (Full report  /   Introduction and summary)

“Early childhood education has long embraced the value of observing classrooms and teacher-child interactions. In early childhood education the features of the settings in which children are served are the hallmarks of quality. These features can include health and safety considerations, the materials and physical layout of the space, and the interactions that take place between adults and children — such as conversations, emotional tone, or physical proximity. Standardized observations of these early childhood education features in turn yield metrics that are used in state and federal policy, program improvement investments, and the credentialing of professionals — all uses that K-12 education is now considering.” (more…)

Read Full Post »

Photo: Kate Samp for Strategies for Children

The more ready Minnesota children are to succeed in kindergarten, the better they tend to perform on the state’s assessments of reading and math in third grade, according to a recent study “Assessing the Validity of Minnesota School Readiness Indicators.”

Using 32 indicators in five domains, Minnesota aims to have all children enter kindergarten school-ready by 2020. Since 2002, it has used the Minnesota Work Sampling System Kindergarten Entry Developmental Checklist (MWSS) on a sample of 5-10% of entering kindergartners to assess children’s progress in personal and social development, language and literacy, mathematical thinking, the arts, and physical development and health. Of the 25 states that collect school readiness data, Minnesota is the only one that does not collect information on all or almost all incoming kindergartners, the report notes.

After controlling for income, race/ethnicity, parent education, gender, and special education status in kindergarten, the Minnesota report finds that children who were proficient on the kindergarten entry assessment were two to three times more likely to score proficient or higher on the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment in reading and math in third grade than children who were not proficient on the MWSS in kindergarten.

The MWSS indicators are aligned with the Minnesota Early Childhood Indicators or Progress and with the state’s K-12 Academic Standards.

“Kindergarten teachers are trained, either in-person (one full day of training) or on-line (approximately three hours), to assess children’s proficiency using the MWSS,” the report states. “During the first eight weeks of school kindergarteners are observed by their teachers in the classroom environment. At the end of the eight weeks, teachers rate children as ‘Proficient,’ ‘In Process’ or ‘Not Yet’ on each indicator…. Using a new overall proficiency standard of attainment of 75% or more of the total points across all 32 items, 53% of kindergartners demonstrated school-ready proficiency [in 2009]. This and other proficiency rates are unchanged since 2007.”

One of the report’s recommendations is to collect school-readiness data on all incoming kindergartners in Minnesota, instead of the current small sample. “Collecting data on all children,” the report states, “would allow the identification of children who are not school ready and the specific problem domain(s) in order to more specifically target academic interventions.”

(Post script. Massachusetts is in the process of implementing a pilot Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry Assessment in two dozen districts.)

Read Full Post »

Photo: Alessandra Hartkopf for Strategies for Children

Samuel J. Meisels, president of the Chicago-based Erikson Institute, a graduate school in child development, has raised some provocative questions about the Common Core State Standards.  By working backward from college and career readiness, he argues, the K-12 standards in English and math give short shrift to early childhood and the developmental needs of the youngest learners, from birth to grade three. And they miss half of early childhood by starting at kindergarten.

Massachusetts is one of 45 states that have adopted the standards. A year ago the state’s Board of Elementary and Secondary Education adopted curriculum frameworks that include the Common Core and aligned standards for pre-kindergarten.

“Early childhood education — concerned with children from birth to the end of third grade — seems nearly an afterthought in the [Common Core] standards,” Meisels writes in the Washington Post’s Answer Sheet blog. “Not only do they end (or begin) at kindergarten, ignoring more than half of the early childhood age range, they simply don’t fit what we know about young children’s learning and development.”

Standards, Meisels notes, are important. (more…)

Read Full Post »

Photo: Alessandra Hartkopf for Strategies for Children

The foundation budget established under the Education Reform Act of 1993 to calculate adequate baseline spending for the state’s public school districts understates the costs of special education and health insurance by more than $2 billion, according to a new report from the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center.

“By comparing actual spending to the foundation budget for Massachusetts school districts in fiscal year (FY) 2010, we find that the real value of the original foundation budget has eroded significantly over time, due in large part to rapid cost growth for health care and special education,” the report — Cutting Class: Underfunding the Foundation Budget’s Core Education Program – states. “Since the foundation budget’s original design did not foresee this rapid cost growth, spending reductions have been forced in other key areas, especially regular education teachers. We also find that due to implementation issues with inflation adjustments, the real value of the foundation budget lags behind the original dollar amounts written into state law in FY 1993.”

Here are the key findings, (more…)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,437 other followers

%d bloggers like this: