<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take Full-Day Kindergarten Off the Sidelines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eyeonearlyeducation.com/2010/06/22/take-full-day-kindergarten-off-the-sidelines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eyeonearlyeducation.com/2010/06/22/take-full-day-kindergarten-off-the-sidelines/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 18:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ada Rosmarin</title>
		<link>http://eyeonearlyeducation.com/2010/06/22/take-full-day-kindergarten-off-the-sidelines/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ada Rosmarin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 01:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeonearlyeducation.org/?p=833#comment-31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, BRAVO to EEA and Irene Sege for this terrific blog on early education!  I am so pleased to participate in this conversation.  Thanks for making it possible.

All education professionals can benefit from ongoing professional development.  And yes, certainly kindergarten teachers should be well trained in early education in order to provide a high quality full-day kindergarten program.  

In Massachusetts, school districts that receive the Full-Day Kindergarten (FDK) grant are required to have a local School Readiness Committee that is comprised of a mix of public and private professionals, parents, district leadership, and community members.  This is a key point through which the early childhood community can and should take an active role in guiding FDK program development, to ensure quality programs.  I believe it is our professional responsibility as a field to  take an active role in this process.

We are extremely fortunate in Massachusetts to have a strong state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education that provides outstanding leadership in the area of high quality kindergarten programs.  Their steadfast commitment to quality has been instrumental in supporting those of us in the field who are developing these programs according to what we know about developmentally appropriate practice.  Their requirement that funded classrooms become NAEYC accredited has helped steer the quality of the programs in the right direction.

I agree with Gwen&#039;s suggestion that elementary principals need to get involved in early education.  The CAYL institute is doing an outstanding job offering this type of support to elementary principals.  The challenge for our field is how to ensure that many more principals engage in learning the ropes of high quality early education so that they can knowledgably support their kindergarten programs.

Finally, I could not be more proud of the full-day kindergarten program in my community - Milton.  The teachers with whom I work are well versed in the tenets of early education, are thrilled to have the time to provide the kinds of opportunities they&#039;ve been wanting to provide for years, and are pleased to have support from the district and state levels.  The program is well paced and responsive to children&#039;s needs.  Parents are voting with their feet and the program has grown leaps and bounds because of the fine work they&#039;re doing.  While we struggle with the finances, requiring the district to charge a modest tuition, the sliding fee scale offers those that need it the most the opportunity to participate for free - as it should and hopefully will be for all before too long.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, BRAVO to EEA and Irene Sege for this terrific blog on early education!  I am so pleased to participate in this conversation.  Thanks for making it possible.</p>
<p>All education professionals can benefit from ongoing professional development.  And yes, certainly kindergarten teachers should be well trained in early education in order to provide a high quality full-day kindergarten program.  </p>
<p>In Massachusetts, school districts that receive the Full-Day Kindergarten (FDK) grant are required to have a local School Readiness Committee that is comprised of a mix of public and private professionals, parents, district leadership, and community members.  This is a key point through which the early childhood community can and should take an active role in guiding FDK program development, to ensure quality programs.  I believe it is our professional responsibility as a field to  take an active role in this process.</p>
<p>We are extremely fortunate in Massachusetts to have a strong state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education that provides outstanding leadership in the area of high quality kindergarten programs.  Their steadfast commitment to quality has been instrumental in supporting those of us in the field who are developing these programs according to what we know about developmentally appropriate practice.  Their requirement that funded classrooms become NAEYC accredited has helped steer the quality of the programs in the right direction.</p>
<p>I agree with Gwen&#8217;s suggestion that elementary principals need to get involved in early education.  The CAYL institute is doing an outstanding job offering this type of support to elementary principals.  The challenge for our field is how to ensure that many more principals engage in learning the ropes of high quality early education so that they can knowledgably support their kindergarten programs.</p>
<p>Finally, I could not be more proud of the full-day kindergarten program in my community &#8211; Milton.  The teachers with whom I work are well versed in the tenets of early education, are thrilled to have the time to provide the kinds of opportunities they&#8217;ve been wanting to provide for years, and are pleased to have support from the district and state levels.  The program is well paced and responsive to children&#8217;s needs.  Parents are voting with their feet and the program has grown leaps and bounds because of the fine work they&#8217;re doing.  While we struggle with the finances, requiring the district to charge a modest tuition, the sliding fee scale offers those that need it the most the opportunity to participate for free &#8211; as it should and hopefully will be for all before too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwen Morgan</title>
		<link>http://eyeonearlyeducation.com/2010/06/22/take-full-day-kindergarten-off-the-sidelines/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwen Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyeonearlyeducation.org/?p=833#comment-17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suggest that school principals and kindergarten teachers need additional early childhood training before trying to implement full-day kindergarten.  The early childhood profession has extensive experience in achieving quality in a full-day program.  
One of the elements of that quality is pacing.  A full-day program is not a part-day education program with a part-day care program tacked on.  Care and education are simultaneous, and quality depends on pacing and transitions.  .  I can remember one high quality part-day program where the teacher in charge was opposed to full-day programs.  She felt that quality could not be achieved if children are subjected to a full-day schedule.  That individual later received funding to operate a full day program.  She was right; it was a really bad program that she created, and she used that experience as proof of her previous opinion.  However, any early childhood expert could have predicted failure by looking at her schedule.  Program licensing rules in our state require that schedules be submitted. But full-day programs in public schools are not licensed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest that school principals and kindergarten teachers need additional early childhood training before trying to implement full-day kindergarten.  The early childhood profession has extensive experience in achieving quality in a full-day program.<br />
One of the elements of that quality is pacing.  A full-day program is not a part-day education program with a part-day care program tacked on.  Care and education are simultaneous, and quality depends on pacing and transitions.  .  I can remember one high quality part-day program where the teacher in charge was opposed to full-day programs.  She felt that quality could not be achieved if children are subjected to a full-day schedule.  That individual later received funding to operate a full day program.  She was right; it was a really bad program that she created, and she used that experience as proof of her previous opinion.  However, any early childhood expert could have predicted failure by looking at her schedule.  Program licensing rules in our state require that schedules be submitted. But full-day programs in public schools are not licensed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
